Advocating for Unshackling the Freight Market with the DOT

As the freight industry continues to evolve in response to global trade dynamics and technological advancements, the need for a more efficient and competitive market has never been more pressing. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) plays a critical role in shaping policies that govern freight transportation, yet many stakeholders argue that existing regulations often stifle innovation and competition. Advocating for the unshackling of the freight market entails reassessing regulatory frameworks that limit operational flexibility and hinder market entry for new players. By fostering a more open and competitive environment, we can enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and improve service quality across the freight sector. This article delves into the key challenges currently facing the freight market, examines the implications of regulatory constraints, and explores potential pathways for reform. It emphasizes the importance of collaboration between government agencies, industry stakeholders, and policymakers to create a more agile and responsive freight ecosystem. Ultimately, unshackling the freight market with the DOT at the helm could pave the way for innovations that not only benefit businesses but also enhance the overall reliability and sustainability of the nation’s supply chain infrastructure.

Industry Voices Speak Out: Deregulation Requests to the DOT

In April, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) issued a public call for input on how to reduce regulatory burdens—a move stemming from President Donald Trump’s executive orders aimed at streamlining federal processes and reducing operational costs across industries. The trucking sector responded with considerable enthusiasm, contributing nearly 900 comments, about 30% of which were directly related to truck drivers and motor carriers.

This feedback underscores a deep-seated frustration within the trucking industry over existing regulations that are viewed as outdated, costly, or overly rigid. Among the top targets for criticism was the electronic logging device (ELD) mandate, with many calling for its repeal or revision. Opponents of the ELD rule argue that it imposes unnecessary expenses and limits drivers’ flexibility, potentially pressuring them into unsafe driving habits in an effort to meet time constraints.

Some even suggested that ELD usage should be reserved only for drivers with poor safety records rather than being universally mandated. However, this position directly conflicts with the stance of the American Trucking Associations (ATA), which has long defended ELDs as vital tools for promoting road safety and ensuring compliance with working hour regulations.

Hours-of-Service Reform and Emissions Concerns

Aside from the ELD issue, a significant portion of industry feedback called for changes to the hours-of-service (HOS) rules. Organizations like the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) proposed several adjustments, including reducing the 10-hour rest requirement to eight hours, removing the 70-hour workweek cap, and increasing flexibility in how drivers split sleeper berth periods. Many also expressed discontent over the 30-minute mandatory break rule, viewing it as disruptive and unnecessary.

Another dominant theme was the impact of emissions regulations, particularly the use of diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) systems. Drivers and fleet operators argued that these regulations introduce major costs and reduce vehicle reliability without delivering proportional environmental benefits. For many small carriers, maintaining compliance with environmental standards has proven to be a significant financial and logistical challenge.

Broker Transparency and Insurance Reform

Concerns about broker transparency featured prominently in the feedback. Numerous commenters called for tighter oversight on broker-carrier transactions, including limitations on broker fees and requirements for brokers to disclose their charges to shippers. These proposed measures were not universally welcomed. Both the ATA and the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA) pushed back, warning that such regulations could distort the competitive freight market and threaten the confidentiality of business operations.

The issue of insurance premiums and safety ratings also drew attention. Several respondents urged the FMCSA to revise how personal driving records affect commercial insurance pricing, stating that this practice unfairly penalizes carriers. Others proposed improvements to accident reporting procedures and how crash histories influence CSA scores, arguing that the current system lacks nuance and fairness.

Size, Weight, and Language Proficiency Challenges

Trucking companies, particularly those operating in specialized markets like hotshot trucking, also requested changes to federal size and weight regulations, calling them outdated and unnecessarily restrictive. The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association entered the conversation with a unique perspective, advocating for wider truck dimensions to better accommodate cameras and sensors required for autonomous vehicle systems.

Language requirements for Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) holders became another focal point, with roughly one-third of respondents demanding stricter English language proficiency enforcement. These contributors cited safety concerns and a lack of regulatory consistency. This matter gained traction following an executive order from President Trump that authorizes placing non-English-proficient drivers out of service—a measure supported by many within the industry.

Tolling, Taxation, and Other Key Concerns

Taxation emerged as a recurring complaint. Many stakeholders voiced frustration over what they view as double taxation, particularly in states with both high fuel taxes and extensive tolling systems. This concern was especially prevalent among operators in the Northeastern U.S., where toll infrastructure is dense and heavily used.

Other areas of concern included privacy issues linked to ELDs and telematics, with drivers wary of intrusive tracking. Additionally, there were requests for streamlining the CDL and motor carrier number application processes, and appeals for better financing options to help new drivers and small business owners enter the industry.

Conclusion: A Sector Eager for Change

The DOT’s call for input revealed a trucking industry that is both eager and desperate for regulatory reform. Across issues ranging from ELD mandates and HOS rules to insurance, broker transparency, and CDL issuance, the message is clear: many in the industry believe that current federal regulations are misaligned with operational realities and hinder rather than help driver safety and business viability.

As the DOT evaluates these comments, the challenge will be balancing legitimate calls for reform with the imperative to maintain safety and accountability on the nation’s highways. Regardless of political affiliation or industry size, stakeholders agree that a smarter, more responsive regulatory framework is essential for the future of American trucking.

🚛 Advocating for a Freer Freight Market Starts with Compliance Confidence

As the trucking industry pushes to unshackle itself from outdated, burdensome regulations—from ELD mandates to hours-of-service rules—staying compliant is key while we advocate for smarter, more flexible policies. At Labworks USA, we’re committed to helping drivers and carriers thrive in this shifting landscape. Whether you're navigating DOT drug and alcohol testing, managing FMCSA Clearinghouse registration, or just trying to stay ahead of compliance changes, our team is here to help you focus on what matters most: moving freight, not fighting red tape.

🔍 Stay informed.
🧭 Stay compliant.
📈 Stay competitive.

👉 Join thousands of drivers and operators who trust Labworks USA to support them as they roll into a freer, more efficient freight market.

Tags: Department of Transportation, motor carriers, truck drivers, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, climate change, federal government, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Justice, safety scores, Donald Trump, electronic logging device, Electronic onboard recorders, Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, driver shortage, Motor Carrier Act of 1980, interstate trucking industry, freight revenue, Washington oversight, Surface Transportation Board, enforcement authority, federal statute, private right of action, autonomous vehicle industry, driverless technology, autonomous vehicles, autonomous trucks, Autonomy Economy, AV STEP, Level 3, autonomous shuttles, China Implements Robotaxi Framework, diesel exhaust fluid systems, emissions regulations, climate pollution, power plants, power sector, carbon dioxide pollution, carbon emissions, renewable energy projects, greenhouse gases, electricity-generating facilities, environment news, environmental values, climate change reduction, Department of Labor, Department of Homeland Security, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Jay Inslee, infrastructure projects, size and weight restrictions, tolling and taxation, San Francisco International Airport, warning triangle exemption, Koop Insurance, high speed rail, Amtrak Cascades, King Street Station, electric rail, Puget Sound, climate neutral transit systems, local comprehensive plans, suburban subdivisions, systemwide tolling, tolling on state highways, passenger rail system, private railroad industry, on-time performance, Biden Plan, Green New Deal, safety scoring, English proficiency, Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse, medical examiner certificates, Joe Biden, infrastructure funding, broker transactions, security service, security solution, online attacks, SQL command, malformed data, Cloudflare Ray ID, site owner, bottom of this page, Sound Transit, HOS (hours-of-service), sleep regulations, CSA (Compliance, Safety, Accountability), Tesla FSD 13.2.2, cross-border trucking, auto supply chains, low-value imports, truck-broker contract rules, shipping fees, passenger-carrying trains, truck speed controls