Analyzing the Tariff Impacts on Diesel Prices and Their Impending Effects on New England

As the global economy grapples with shifting trade policies and market dynamics, the implications of tariffs on essential commodities, such as diesel fuel, remain a critical concern for various sectors. In New England, where transportation and industrial activity are heavily reliant on diesel, recent tariff changes have raised questions about the short- and long-term impacts on fuel prices.

This article aims to dissect the intricate relationship between tariff implementations and diesel pricing, exploring how these economic measures can ripple through the supply chain, affecting not only costs for consumers and businesses but also broader regional economic stability. With diesel prices being a significant factor in transportation costs, which influence everything from freight charges to consumer goods pricing, understanding the nuances of tariff impacts becomes essential.

Furthermore, as New England looks toward a future increasingly defined by energy transition and sustainability goals, the interplay between tariffs, fuel costs, and the region’s economic health warrants a thorough examination. This analysis will provide insights into the potential consequences of tariff policies on diesel prices and their cascading effects on New England’s economy, thereby informing stakeholders and policymakers as they navigate these turbulent waters.

Heavy reliance on Canadian imports of refined products makes region a test ground

New England is expected to serve as a key observation point for the effects of a 10% tariff imposed on Canadian crude oil and refined product exports to the United States, particularly regarding retail fuel prices. While Mexico is also subjected to these tariffs, its primary role is as a crude oil supplier to the U.S. In contrast, Canada is a significant exporter of both crude and refined products. Consequently, the impact of tariffs on crude imports may take some time to manifest in diesel and gasoline prices at retail outlets. Notably, Mexico faces a steeper tariff of 25%. The region of New England is particularly vulnerable to these changes due to its reliance on imported refined products from Canada, sourced primarily from refineries in Eastern Canadian provinces like the Irving Oil refinery located in Saint John, New Brunswick, just across the border from Maine.

For instance, data from December—the most recent available—indicates that the U.S. government-designated PADD 1 region, which encompasses the entire East Coast, imported over 1 million barrels of refined products daily from Canada. While this data does not provide a state-by-state breakdown, it can be inferred that a substantial portion of these imports services New England, given its lack of local refining capabilities. The first indication of New England's front-line status regarding tariff impacts emerged from Irving Oil's actions. Patrick DeHaan, GasBuddy's head of petroleum analysis, and Tom Kloza, OPIS's energy analysis chief, reported that Irving Oil raised wholesale diesel prices by approximately 20 cents per gallon across much of New England as of Tuesday morning. This increase was not substantiated by any shift in the futures price of ultra-low sulfur diesel on the CME, which had been relatively stable or declining, including a notable drop of 4.64 cents to settle at $2.2408 per gallon on Wednesday.

In the industry, wholesale prices are referred to as rack prices. Kloza noted that diesel rack prices in New England were hovering around $2.40 per gallon, suggesting that a 10% tariff could potentially add about 24 cents to the price—consistent with the increases observed at Irving. Rack prices are subject to frequent fluctuations, often changing daily or even multiple times within a single day, especially in a volatile market where they closely correlate with movements in futures markets. As of Wednesday, Kloza had not observed further price hikes from other suppliers, which he indicated could render Irving uncompetitive in the market.

The pricing strategy employed by Irving Oil serves as an initial indicator of how the tariffs might disrupt the refined products market in PADD 1, with potential for immediate short-term effects. Other suppliers may either align their prices with Irving, which is heavily dependent on Canadian imports, or they may seek alternative non-tariff supplies to gain a competitive edge.

In a statement released in early February, Irving acknowledged the anticipated repercussions of the tariffs, stating, “The majority of the product produced at our Saint John refinery is bound for the U.S. market, reinforcing our company’s critical role as a contributor to Canadian-refined petroleum exports to the U.S. annually. This tariff will result in price increases for our U.S. customers and have impacts on energy security and the broader economy. We urge all stakeholders within government and industry to work together toward a resolution as soon as possible.”

Expert discussions in the refined product sector have raised several unanswered questions about market dynamics. While Canada supplies a significant portion of refined products to PADD 1, it does not hold a monopoly. In December, for example, Canada accounted for approximately 40% of the 1 million barrels per day imported into PADD 1.

The Netherlands, with its extensive refining infrastructure in Rotterdam and Amsterdam, followed Canada as a supplier, exporting 100,000 barrels per day, while the United Kingdom contributed 47,000 barrels daily. The U.S. Department of Energy also reports substantial intra-PADD movements, further complicating the supply landscape.

The Response

In response to potential tariff disruptions, Canada might redirect its refined products from Saint John to European markets, which could then supply the U.S. This route introduces additional shipping costs, creating inefficiencies solely to circumvent tariffs. The feasibility of such maneuvers will hinge on multiple factors, including shipping rates and crude oil prices.

Moreover, logistical constraints may hinder the movement of products from the Gulf Coast to the Northeast, particularly due to limited pipeline capacity, such as that of the Colonial pipeline, which connects the Houston area to the mid-Atlantic and New York. Any U.S. products shipped from the Gulf to New England to compensate for reduced Canadian imports would necessitate transport on Jones Act vessels—U.S.-flagged ships that typically incur higher costs than their international counterparts. The complexities of supply chain adjustments could lead to a cycle of repositioning U.S. exports to meet the demand for refined products in New England, as European supplies shift to avoid tariffs.

Fuel surcharges may also face complications. For fleets in New England with surcharges tied to the EIA’s weekly average retail price, a significant divergence between regional prices and national averages could introduce “basis risk.” This term refers to the disconnect between a company’s price benchmark and its actual exposure, which could lead to an inadequately reflective surcharge amid tariff-induced price spikes. Currently, there is a notable disparity between the national average retail diesel price of $3.635 per gallon and the average price in New England, reported at $4.037 per gallon. This discrepancy will be closely monitored as the situation evolves.

Regarding the broader national landscape, Canada serves as the sole supplier of crude imports to PADD 2, which encompasses much of the Upper Midwest. In December, PADD 2 imported 2.9 million barrels of Canadian crude daily, with a refining capacity of 4.25 million barrels per day. While some crude is transported via rail, the majority relies on pipelines. The capacity for PADD 2 to replace Canadian crude with alternative sources is limited. Historical pipelines that once transported crude from the Gulf to the Midwest have been repurposed to accommodate the growing supply of Canadian crude.

DeHaan noted that it may take time for the 10% tariff on crude imports to influence wholesale or refined product prices. He indicated that the processing timeline for crude through refiners may span several weeks, contrasting with the more immediate effects seen in the Northeast, where refined products are subject to just-in-time delivery constraints. In comparison, Mexican crude and product exports to the U.S. totaled 517,000 barrels per day in December, all transported by water, which allows for rerouting to bypass U.S. tariffs. However, this situation mirrors the complexities of Canadian exports, as economically optimal market strategies may be bypassed in favor of tariff evasion methods.

In Conclusion

In conclusion, the implications of tariffs on diesel prices are multifaceted and significant, particularly for the New England region. As we have examined, fluctuating diesel costs not only affect transportation and logistics but also ripple through various sectors of the economy, impacting everything from consumer goods to local businesses. The potential for increased operational costs may lead to higher prices for consumers and could challenge the region’s economic resilience. Stakeholders, including policymakers and industry leaders, must closely monitor these developments to mitigate negative consequences and explore strategies that promote stability in fuel pricing. As New England navigates this complex landscape, proactive measures will be essential to ensure that the region adapts effectively to the evolving economic climate shaped by tariff policies.

If you want to stay updated with a wide range of trends, actionable insights, and innovative solutions in the trucking, freight, and logistics industry, stay connected to us.

Moreover, If you are looking for more information about drug and alcohol testing as a truck driver, visit LabWorks USA. Our DOT Consortium's friendly team will be more than happy to discuss any concerns you may have and work with you to ensure you are always fully compliant, especially with random DOT drug and alcohol testing. Moreover, if you need help with FMCSA Clearinghouse registration, we can further support you.

Tags: Chinese imports, retaliatory tariffs, Canadian imports, additional tariff, average price, oil prices, economic activity, Doug Ford, fossil fuel, percent tariff, potential tariff, tariff announcement, tariff on imports, tariff impacts, gas prices, gasoline prices, refined products, agricultural products, trade tensions, Financial markets, energy markets, stock market, Chinese exports, Mexican exports, gas pumps, Howard Lutnick, Justin Trudeau, Patrick De Haan, tariffs on imports, potential impact, direct impact, effective tariff rate, import tariffs, reciprocal tariffs, tariff rates, baseline tariff, energy tariff, impact of tariffs, punitive tariffs, Canadian tariffs, cost of tariffs, crude prices, fuel prices, energy prices, consumer prices, American products, domestic product, Canadian energy products, Canadian products, trade policies, broader economy, Canadian exports, Business intelligence reports, 30-day pause, 90-day pause, commerce secretary, United States, ISO New England, Argus Media, Saint John, Canadian hydropower, North Dakota, prices for consumers, Saudi Arabia, advance notice, Chinese deliveries, competitive advantage, crude imports, Canadian energy imports, annual cost, cost increase, cost of gas, central banks, Auto tariffs, board tariffs, sweeping tariffs, tariff increases, automotive tariffs, base line tariff, counter - tariffs, egg prices, average gas price, Chinese products, Canadian product imports, trade deficit, bilateral trade deficit, market share, Canadian economy, regional economy, Business Consulting, low-income households, American households, commerce ministry, Dominion Voting Systems, Vermont Gas Systems