Exploring the US Postal Service's Connection to the Executive Branch

The United States Postal Service (USPS) plays a pivotal role in the nation’s communication and logistics infrastructure, yet its intricate relationship with the executive branch often goes underappreciated. Established in 1775, the USPS has evolved from a small network of post riders into a vital institution that connects millions of Americans every day. As a quasi-independent agency operating under the executive branch, the Postal Service is uniquely positioned at the crossroads of governmental authority and public service. This article aims to delve into the historical context and operational framework of the USPS, examining how its functions intersect with executive powers, policies, and priorities. Furthermore, we will explore how different administrations have shaped its trajectory, reflecting broader societal changes and the evolving demands of the American public. By analyzing key legislation, executive orders, and the role of the Postmaster General, we can better understand the complexities of this agency’s governance and its significance within the broader framework of federal administration. Ultimately, this exploration will illuminate the USPS's essential role not only as a service provider but also as a reflection of the values and challenges of governance in contemporary America.

Reevaluating the Role of the USPS in Modern America

The approach taken by President Donald Trump towards restructuring government agencies—particularly his proposal to bring the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) under the executive branch and consider its privatization—has sparked considerable debate. While controversial, there are valid arguments supporting the reevaluation of USPS's function in today’s digital society.

Originally established in 1775 with Benjamin Franklin as the first postmaster general, the USPS was created to facilitate communication across the colonies. It delivered legal documents, business correspondence, and personal letters—critical services in an era lacking telephones or internet. As a result, it operated as a quasi-monopoly with federal oversight to ensure reliability and reach.

However, in 2025, this landscape has shifted dramatically. The USPS is no longer the primary means of communication or delivery of vital documents. The rise of fax machines, broadband, email, and digital platforms in the 1990s dramatically reduced the volume of traditional mail, prompting the USPS to pivot toward the growing parcel market in search of sustainable revenue streams.

The USPS and the Parcel Market Challenge

While USPS letter carriers were once known for delivering letters on foot or horseback, the logistics of managing parcels—some weighing up to 70 pounds—has created operational challenges. The parcel delivery model does not entirely align with USPS’s traditional strengths or infrastructure.

In 2006, Congress divided USPS services into two categories: dominant (such as first-class mail) and competitive (parcels). The Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) was tasked with ensuring that competitive services did not benefit unfairly from government subsidies that could undercut private carriers like UPS, FedEx, and Amazon.

Ironically, despite regulatory safeguards, the USPS gained a significant market advantage through exclusive access to mailboxes for parcel deliveries. Roughly 60% of consumer parcels fit in these mailboxes, and over 80% of USPS parcels qualify. This access gives the USPS an operational edge that its private-sector competitors cannot legally match.

Policy Solutions and Workforce Implications

To address this competitive imbalance, policymakers have two viable paths: either restrict the USPS from using mailboxes for parcels or permit private delivery firms to access them as well. On a broader level, USPS could return to its foundational mission—mail delivery—while allowing private firms to handle the growing parcel load.

Such a shift would likely result in further workforce reductions. However, this is a trend already underway. Over the last three decades, the USPS has outsourced a growing portion of its transportation and sorting operations to third parties. Despite a drop in workforce from 753,384 in 1995 to around 533,000 in 2024, the agency’s revenue has increased from $54 billion to $80 billion.

This trend demonstrates that a leaner USPS can continue to generate higher revenue by focusing on core services while allowing private enterprise to innovate and scale in the logistics sector. The debate, then, centers less on survival and more on structure and purpose.

Rural Service and the Private Sector

One of the main concerns about privatization or role reduction of USPS is service continuity in rural areas. Critics argue that private companies may neglect less profitable regions due to sparse population density and lower parcel volumes.

Yet, rural communities are already served by private airlines, and major logistics companies like Amazon are actively expanding their delivery networks into remote areas. Moreover, the federal government does not directly manage rural phone or internet infrastructure; private firms handle these responsibilities through market incentives and innovation.

If rural delivery remains a public policy priority, a targeted subsidy model could ensure service continuity without maintaining the current USPS structure. This approach would mirror existing subsidies in other public-private utility partnerships.

Streamlining Governance and Oversight

Bringing the USPS under the executive branch could streamline decision-making and eliminate redundant oversight bodies. Currently, the USPS is governed by a board of governors, overseen by the Postal Regulatory Commission, and monitored by an Office of Inspector General—structures that were more relevant in a past era dominated by physical correspondence and money orders.

In a digital age, where financial transactions are predominantly electronic, the need for such layers of oversight is reduced. A more centralized governance model under the executive branch could allow for quicker adjustments to market shifts and regulatory demands, improving responsiveness and cost-efficiency.

If this leaner model leads to financial shortfalls, the USPS can raise postage rates to offset losses. Even with higher rates, U.S. postage would remain lower than in many European countries such as Germany, France, and the U.K.—nations that operate within much smaller geographic areas.

Modernizing Mailing and Marketing Strategies

Increased postage may concern high-volume mailers, particularly those relying on marketing mail. However, businesses can reduce costs by consolidating shipments to the same address and redirecting portions of their advertising budgets to digital platforms like Google, Facebook, and Amazon, which offer better targeting and tracking.

With mail volumes declining from 212 billion to 113 billion pieces over the past two decades, and with most mail no longer time-sensitive, maintaining a six-day delivery schedule may be unnecessary. Adjusting delivery frequency could cut operational costs without drastically affecting service quality or customer satisfaction.

This pivot would encourage the USPS to modernize in step with changing communication habits, focusing on quality over quantity and ensuring services remain relevant in a predominantly digital world.

Conclusion: A Case for Reimagining the USPS

From its founding as a vital communications network to its current role in parcel delivery, the USPS has undergone a dramatic transformation. President Trump’s proposal to restructure the USPS under the executive branch and reconsider its competitive role reflects a broader need for market alignment and operational efficiency.

The agency has already demonstrated an ability to adapt through outsourcing, workforce reductions, and revenue growth. As the private sector continues to handle more logistics and digital communication dominates, the USPS must reassess its mission.

Streamlining oversight, focusing on core mail services, and enabling private carriers to fill delivery gaps could improve service quality while reducing inefficiencies. While politically contentious, structural reform of the USPS may be necessary to ensure it remains relevant, sustainable, and aligned with modern communication and delivery needs.

Stay Connected With Us

As the trucking industry continues to adapt to shifting policies, regulatory reforms, and structural changes—much like the USPS is undergoing—it’s more important than ever to stay informed and compliant. At Labworks USA, we don’t just keep you updated with the latest industry trends and compliance insights; we actively support drivers and fleet operators with essential services. Whether you need guidance on random DOT drug and alcohol testing, or help navigating FMCSA Clearinghouse registration, our trusted DOT Consortium team is here to assist. Stay connected with us for solutions that keep you on the road—and always in full compliance.

Tags: Postal Service, Postmaster General, Board of Governors, Louis DeJoy, United States Postal Service, President Trump, Postal Regulatory Commission, postal services, Commerce Department, White House, executive order, package delivery, post offices, postal system, Post Office Department, rural areas, parcel delivery, Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, Postal Reorganization Act, Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, Universal Service Obligation, first-class mail, mail volume, Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund, mail volumes, United States Postal System, postal officials, delivery operations, postal reform, employee compensation, Postal Service board, Postal Service reform, Supreme Court, Delivering for America, last-mile deliveries, eminent domain, package volume, unfunded liabilities, Heritage Foundation, National Association of Letter Carriers, postal network, IT systems, postal markets, postal monopoly, supply chain, shelf space, product types, Anton Hajjar, Kevin Kosar, CARES Act, postal reform legislation, Postal Clause, bipartisan help, Congressional Record, Federal Government Management, Presidential Transition, Biden administration, Department of Education, Office of Management and Budget, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Network Modernization, USPS Connect, USPS Ground Advantage, Sorting and Delivery Centers, delivery units, Next Generation Delivery Vehicles, Regional Processing and Distribution Centers, Local Processing Centers, digital communication, mail-in voting, package business, postal customer, COVID-19 pandemic, postal revenue, Medicare Advantage, Student loan debt, Federal Student Aid, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Title I funding, postal regulators, CRS Products, Congressional Research Service, Law Numbers, Trade Relations, Export Controls, small modular reactor, Chamber of Origin, U.S. Postal Service, postal workforce, postal delivery, postal facilities, Reforming the U.S. Postal Service, postal policies, Presidential Message, Executive Communication, COTS vehicles, postal costs, postal stakeholders, postal agencies, postal packages, Library of Congress Documents