In recent years, the trucking industry has found itself at a crossroads, grappling with the complexities of compliance amidst the backdrop of the Department of Transportation's (DOT) deregulation efforts. As the federal government seeks to streamline regulations to foster innovation and enhance operational efficiency, the implications for trucking companies—ranging from small operators to large fleets—are profound. While deregulation promises to reduce red tape and lower operational costs, it simultaneously introduces a host of compliance challenges that require vigilant navigation. From fluctuating safety standards to evolving environmental regulations, trucking companies must adapt swiftly to maintain compliance while ensuring the safety of their operations and the integrity of their services. This article explores the intricacies of these compliance challenges, offering insights into effective strategies for navigating the shifting regulatory landscape. By examining the potential impacts of deregulation on safety, environmental policies, and industry standards, we aim to equip trucking professionals with the knowledge necessary to thrive in this dynamic environment. As the industry evolves, understanding the balance between regulatory flexibility and compliance obligations will be critical for sustaining operational success and ensuring long-term viability in an increasingly competitive marketplace.

This week, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) announced a sweeping effort to eliminate dozens of trucking regulations, raising alarm among experts and safety advocates. The move affects 52 regulations from key agencies, including the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). While a 60-day comment window has been granted, many of the rules are expected to be repealed. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy emphasized that the regulatory rollback aims to cut red tape, reduce inefficiencies, and refocus government efforts on what truly benefits the public. “Under President Trump’s direction,” Duffy stated, “we are dismantling outdated regulations that burden the system without improving safety.” The DOT hopes these changes will streamline operations while maintaining high safety standards. Among the FMCSA's 20 actions, two rules have been finalized, while 18 remain under proposal. Experts, however, are cautioning that not all these revisions may lead to smoother operations — and could, in fact, introduce new complications.

Regulatory Simplifications or Compliance Hazards?

P. Sean Garney, co-director of Scopelitis Transportation Consulting, flagged several FMCSA proposals that could generate unforeseen compliance challenges. One such change involves the elimination of a rule requiring drivers to carry a hard copy of their electronic logging device (ELD) user manual. While this seems like a minor modernization, Garney explains that drivers still need access to instructions for data transfer and malfunction handling, as well as blank logs. Without proper preparation, carriers could face trouble during roadside inspections. Another FMCSA proposal would revise the requirement that roadside inspection forms be signed and returned to state agencies. Garney highlighted that because not all states enforce this, the lack of a standardized policy could lead to inconsistencies and confusion. Motor carriers may struggle to comply with varying state-level expectations, creating yet another layer of administrative strain.

FMCSA is also looking to rescind the manufacturing certification label requirement for rear impact guards on truck trailers. While carriers often complain that labels wear off and become unreadable, removing the requirement may not resolve enforcement complications. Garney pointed out that even without FMCSA enforcement, the obligation to have the label still exists under NHTSA’s Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. This divergence between agency rules raises an important question: if a trailer is involved in an accident and the rear guard label is unreadable, who holds liability? These kinds of gray areas make it difficult for carriers to maintain consistent safety and legal standards, especially during inspections or post-accident investigations.

Not everyone agrees that deregulation is the best path forward. The Truck Safety Coalition (TSC), which supports families of crash victims, has voiced significant concerns over FMCSA’s approach. Zach Cahalan, Executive Director of TSC, acknowledged that some regulations may be outdated, but emphasized that the agency must provide concrete data showing that proposed changes will not compromise safety. One regulation under review requires retroreflective sheeting on trailers made before 1993 to enhance visibility at night. FMCSA argues that these trailers are likely no longer in service, but Cahalan criticized the agency for offering no statistical evidence. In his view, assuming such vehicles are off the roads is dangerous and dismissive of real safety risks. Cahalan also opposed the proposed removal of ELD manual requirements. He argued that the manual plays an essential role in ensuring drivers — many of whom are undertrained — know how to properly use their equipment. Given the persistent issue of driver fatigue and the National Transportation Safety Board’s continued emphasis on its dangers, eliminating tools that aid compliance sends the wrong message.

The DOT's deregulatory initiative is designed to promote efficiency and reduce bureaucratic burdens, but the trucking industry remains divided on its impact. While some changes may streamline operations, others risk creating confusion, compliance challenges, and potentially compromising safety. As the public comment period unfolds and the FMCSA finalizes its rule changes, both carriers and safety advocates must remain engaged. Ensuring that efficiency doesn’t come at the cost of accountability will require thoughtful collaboration between regulators, industry leaders, and those affected most by these decisions.

Stay Ahead in a Shifting Regulatory Landscape

As DOT deregulation reshapes the trucking industry, staying informed is more important than ever. Follow us for the latest insights, policy updates, and solutions that keep your fleet compliant and competitive. If you're a truck driver or carrier seeking clarity on DOT drug and alcohol testing requirements, Labworks USA is here to help. Our friendly DOT Consortium team ensures you're always up to date — from random testing to FMCSA Clearinghouse support. Let’s navigate these changes together.

Tags: executive order, Department of Transportation, motor carrier, federal agencies, Speed Limiters, trucking associations, safety regulations, federal government, regulatory changes, deregulatory efforts, Transportation Secretary, Federal Register, real time, Sean Duffy, Electronic IDs, DataQ system, UCR Fees, Clearinghouse Return-to-Duty Process, Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse, California AB5, driver safety, safety culture, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Commercial Driver's License, combination unit trucks, insurance premiums, electronic logging devices, semi-trailer truck, fuel consumption, International Fuel Tax Agreement, International Registration Plan, federal trucking regulations, retroreflective sheeting, ELD vendor manual, English language proficiency requirements, impact guard certification labels, seat belt anchorages, tire labeling, roof crush resistance, industry feedback, trade groups, Deregulatory Rules, OSHA's 2025 Amputations NEP, Borderlands Mexico, Texas border city, North American trade, North American society, trade policy, manufacturing facility, import cold storage facility, manufacturing operations, cold storage, Automotive supplier, supply chain disruption, Unified Regulatory Agenda, public health, homeland security, temporary regulatory rollback, budgetary priorities, operational feasibility, Supreme Court of the United States, Jackson Lewis PC, Federal OBBBA Round-Up, Privacy for Work Episode 5, Commercial Contracts, America's Infrastructure, Federal Grants, Surface Transportation Reauthorization, air traffic controller staffing, build as quickly and much as possible, BUILD grants, environmental reviews, marine highway program, transportation policy, air traffic control system, Freight Transportation Services Index, payment processes, digital payments, artificial intelligence, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, consumer protection, antitrust enforcement, economic recovery, coronavirus pandemic, MBL Seminars, Remote Workforce, Labor Law Developments, Data Protection & Privacy, 10-for-1 rule, U.S.-based airlines, airline technology, airspace access issues, U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Sean P. Duffy, Mid-Year 2025