NHTSA Denies Families' Request for Investigation into Truck Rear-Guard Safety

In a recent decision that has garnered significant attention, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has declined to initiate a formal investigation into the rear-guard systems of large trucks, a move that has left families of crash victims disheartened and concerned about road safety. The request for an inquiry stemmed from multiple incidents involving truck-related accidents, where families argued that inadequate rear protection contributed to the severity of injuries sustained by victims.

Advocates for increased vehicular safety have long highlighted the need for improved regulations surrounding truck design, particularly regarding features that could mitigate the impact of collisions. The NHTSA's refusal to pursue a probe raises critical questions about the agency’s commitment to ensuring public safety and its responsiveness to the concerns of victims' families.

As the debate over truck safety standards continues, stakeholders from various sectors—including lawmakers, safety advocates, and the trucking industry—are weighing in on the implications of this decision. This article explores the rationale behind the NHTSA’s stance, the potential impact on families affected by truck accidents, and the broader conversation regarding regulatory oversight in the wake of rising traffic fatalities.

Issues raised by parents of children killed in crashes can be addressed by ongoing agency actions, according to regulators

Federal regulators have rejected a request from parents of children who tragically lost their lives in truck accidents, urging an investigation into potentially defective truck safety equipment that is intended to mitigate fatalities in collisions with passenger vehicles. In their decision regarding the petition filed in 2022 by Jerry and Marianne Karth, Eric Hein, and Lois Durso-Hawkins, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) stated that the concerns raised are more appropriately addressed through the agency's recent regulatory initiatives and ongoing efforts mandated by the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. This information was conveyed by Eileen Sullivan, NHTSA’s associate administrator for enforcement, in a notice issued on Tuesday.

The petitioners specifically called for an inquiry and a subsequent recall of equipment linked to fatal incidents where passenger vehicles collide with the rear of trucks—a situation known as underride—due to either defective or absent rear impact guards (RIGs) on van-type or box trailers. “The Department of Transportation can no longer ignore the dangers posed by rear underride collisions,” the petitioners asserted. “NHTSA must conduct a thorough analysis, which will likely reveal that this documented defect constitutes an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety and qualifies as a ‘safety defect.’ Consequently, manufacturers should be mandated to initiate a recall to address the risk of death and severe injuries stemming from semi-trailers lacking effective rear impact guards.”

The Government Initiated Recall

They further emphasized that without a government-initiated recall, “truck and trailer manufacturers and operators will not voluntarily mitigate the known risks to public safety by developing and implementing safer vehicles equipped with effective rear underride prevention measures.” “Crash tests have shown that advanced rear underride guard technology is available, has been extensively studied, and represents a straightforward and cost-effective solution to the significant hazard of rear underride collisions affecting the traveling public.”

In response, Sullivan noted that after assessing over 200 news articles documenting fatal truck crashes submitted by the petitioners, NHTSA found that only 22 involved box trailers. Of those incidents, the agency could identify the trailer manufacturer in nine cases; however, it was unable to ascertain the specific model years, she stated. Sullivan also highlighted that a month after the investigation request was submitted, NHTSA implemented new minimum safety standards for rear guards, replacing the original standards that had been in place since 1996. The updated regulations became effective on January 11, 2023, with a compliance deadline set for no later than July 15, 2024.

Nevertheless, safety advocates criticized NHTSA’s final rule as insufficient. Joan Claybrook, a former NHTSA administrator, labeled the regulation as “regulatory malpractice,” arguing that it failed to elevate public safety standards, particularly as 94% of trailers already complied with the new guidelines. “NHTSA has lowered the bar on public safety rather than reinforcing it,” she remarked at the time. In addition to the rear-guard regulation, Sullivan announced that NHTSA is researching rear impact guard designs that could offer enhanced protection for passengers in various scenarios involving rear underride collisions.

NHTSA'S Advisory

Since the petition was filed, Karth has been appointed to NHTSA’s advisory committee on underride protection, which aims to provide guidance and recommendations to the U.S. Department of Transportation on safety regulations aimed at reducing underride incidents. In response to NHTSA’s denial of her petition, Karth, whose daughters AnnaLeah and Mary succumbed to injuries from an underride collision in 2013, expressed her disappointment.

“NHTSA references the 2022 final rule, which updated previous standards but still falls short of what insurers and manufacturers have demonstrated can effectively prevent underride accidents,” Karth stated in an interview. “I remain hopeful that NHTSA will fulfill its commitment outlined in the decision, indicating that this ruling does not preclude the agency from pursuing further action if deemed necessary. If we can achieve substantial results that warrant strengthening the rear guard regulation, I trust that will also lead NHTSA to proceed with this investigation.”

In Conclusion

The NHTSA's decision to deny the families' request for an investigation into truck rear-guard safety raises significant concerns about the agency’s commitment to vehicle safety standards. While the agency cited insufficient evidence linking rear guards to accidents, the emotional testimonies and tragic experiences of affected families underscore the pressing need for a thorough examination of safety regulations. As the debate continues, it is essential for stakeholders, including policymakers and safety advocates, to prioritize the protection of vulnerable road users and ensure that robust safety measures are enforced in the trucking industry. Only through diligent oversight and responsive action can we hope to prevent future tragedies and enhance road safety for all.

If you want to stay updated with a wide range of trends, actionable insights, and innovative solutions in the trucking, freight, and logistics industry, stay connected to us. 

Moreover, If you are looking for more information about drug and alcohol testing as a truck driver, visit LabWorks USA. Our DOT Consortium's friendly team will be more than happy to discuss any concerns you may have and work with you to ensure you are always fully compliant, especially with random DOT drug and alcohol testing. Moreover, if you need help with FMCSA Clearinghouse registration, we can further support you.